About Me

Name: PoliCzar
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

What constitutes a 'Holy Book'

As we all know, the first Muslim ever elected to Congress, Keith Ellison, wishes to take his oath of office with his hand on a Koran as opposed to the customary Bible. Many conservatives in Congress are trying to block these proceedings. The irony here is that these conservatives, who are rather well known and respected, are not following the Constitution they have already sworn to uphold. We know that our Constitution allows freedom of religion. Not allowing Mr. Ellison to use his religion’s book for the oath is a direct violation of the rights that are given to every American in the First Amendment. The oath does not require you to pledge allegiance to any God or deity. You are pledging to upload the Constitution of the United States.
Why should it matter what book he puts his hand on? Since when do someone’s religious views affect their ability to make decisions on behalf of the community that elected him or her? It would be the same thing as if you would not allow an atheist or agnostic to take the oath if they refused to use any book at all. Why wouldn’t they just put their hand on a copy of the Constitution and swear to uphold it? I understand that the Bible is an important part of these ceremonies. It is not as if he is being asked to quote from it. It is hard to say why there is so much emphasis placed on what book you use. There are many different editions of the Bible and different people use different ones, Catholics, Protestants, and even Jews select their own version. Why should it be a problem for Mr. Ellison to use his religion’s holy book?


The problem here is that these conservatives are trying to decide what is and what is not a ‘holy book’ and are using religion as a basis to discredit an obvious qualified individual. It also helps that he is a democrat apparently. As a conservative and as an American, I am rather disappointed with their actions. This proves yet another point, certain Republicans cannot seem to grasp the concept that the election is over and that they must work with the other side of the aisle if they wish to gain respect among their fellow Americans. By disregarding a man’s Constitutional right to religious freedom, they are proving their own ambitions and personal beliefs are more important than the laws of our country.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive