About Me

Name: PoliCzar
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

Another wasted night at the Oscars

I’d like to thank the academy for providing us with the worst Oscars in recent memory.  Multiple hours of nothingness led by John Stewart.  Its hard to believe that the writers strike was over because this ceremony was horrible.  Maybe they went back to the ceremony they had planned without writers, or maybe the writers are just that bad.  They ran clip after clip after clip with no real content.  The presenters looked like they were on some downer drug and everyone who won was foreign!  I need to check to see when the last time all Americans won at the British academy awards.  Not that I am complaining, I thought that Daniel Day-Lewis was by far the best actor and I loved seeing George “Darfur” Clooney get snubbed.   It didn’t really matter because no one was watching it anyway.  According to Neilson this was the worst ratings since 2003 which was the worst over all. 

 What was even worse was the red carpet show prior to the awards themselves.  I love it when actresses who know nothing about foreign policy, war or our country, wear little orange ribbons for the closing of Gitmo.  Julie Christie, I’m talking to you. She apparently has been there so many times and have seen the conditions and believe we are keeping these people imprisoned against their will. Wrong, she has never been there.  The only torture the prisoners are really receiving is when we make them watch the movies these people are in.  I’m so happy that foreigners can come to our country, make lots of money and then tell us off.  I think there was only 1 or 2 people wearing those ribbons anyway, you can see that concept really caught on.  Retirement was the right thing to do Julie, no need to try politics this late in your life.  Dr. Zhivago is waiting.

 I find it funny that if Hollywood hates America so much, perhaps they should move to Cuba.  Since according to Michael Moore Cuba’s health care is better than ours, and his movie ‘Sicko’ was nominated for an academy award this year, maybe all of the Hollywood left will defect to Cuba.  We can only hope.  I liked when they introduced the troops in Iraq to present an award.  Tom Hanks made no mention of them as troops or anything, just people who haven’t been home in awhile.  And there were no ‘Thank-You’s’ to the troops, nor did he say ‘we appreciate what you are doing for us’ it was nothing, cut right to the troops then that was it.  Horrible.   Notice, however, anti-war movies such as The Valley of Elah or Lions for Lambs were not nominated.  At least they got that right.

 It doesn’t really matter, nobody watched it, anyway.  They were all watching Zoolander on TBS.

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Case for McCain

Romney dropped out of the race this week and during his announcement at CPAC he gave one of the best conservative speeches in at least the last 15 years. It was amazing. While I was watching this I was thinking, where was this speech before Super Tuesday? Why did they leave it until the end? That was the biggest error of the Romney campaign. Instead of talking about Washington being broken, perhaps he should have given variations on this speech at his rallies, that would have brought more votes and we may actually see Romney ahead.

McCain's speech was not bad either. It was predicted that he was going to try to reach out to conservatives, many of whom hate McCain’s stances on so many issues. Many just hate McCain because they feel he is too liberal. After some thought and reflection after Tuesday night I have come up with a few issues that might interest you regarding McCain. Think of this. Hillary and Obama are 100 times more left wing than McCain could ever be. These issues range in topic, from social to economic, let’s look at them:

Do you support the judges who are pro-abortion and even pro-late term abortion? If you do, then do not vote for McCain.

Do you support restrictions on hand guns? (Gun Control) If you do, then do not vote for McCain.

Do you want your taxes increased every year regardless of your income level? If you do, then do not vote for McCain.

Do you want socialist health care in our country destroying our hospitals and ruining the entire medical field as we know it? If you do, then do not vote for McCain.

Do you want us to leave Iraq without finishing off the terrorists and give them victory so that they can march all the way to our soil and kill us all? If you do then you are crazy and please move away, but do not vote for McCain before you do.

Do you want uncontrolled spending in Washington? Do you want bills that are ear-marked so badly that economy may not be able to recover for decades? If you do then do not vote for McCain.

These are just a few issues that concern conservatives. On each one of these McCain has been quite conservative. I realize he didn’t vote for Bush’s tax cut plan, but he certainly supports cutting taxes, maybe not in the way we wanted at the time. He will not appoint liberal judges to the bench, that’s guaranteed. He will not socialize our health care system. And I think you know he will fight all terrorists and protect us much better than any Democrat would. McCain also wants to rid congress of their over spending aka earmarks. He is a champion for this issue.

It seems to me that working with McCain on these will be easy. We can also work with him on immigration and the first amendment. He is can change his view on immigration to come up with a sound –no amnesty- bill that will work for everyone. We can work with him by getting the tax cuts permanent and find ways to keep jobs in this country. Closing the border is the only way, and I’m sure if he is elected he will get an earful from us on these issues. Yes we have given him a lot to think about over the past month. We have attacked him on several issues. I still believe we need to continue to give this message. McCain does not have blinders on and earplugs in when it comes to our opinions. He can hear and he can read. Hillary and Obama, I’m not so certain.

So is McCain all that bad? Certainly not. Are the 2 Democrats running bad? Guaranteed.

So I ask you to re-read those questions above one more time and think to yourself, who would be better as our President, our candidate John McCain or Hillary/Obama? I think the answer is quite clear.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Super Tuesday?

What an interesting turn of events for this ‘Super Tuesday’
Even at 15.5% of the votes tallied in California McCain holds a steady lead to Romney’s second place. Even though Giuliani and Thompson hold many votes as well, no doubt from absentee ballots as well as the idiots who actually voted for them on the ballot since they were still listed, over 100,000 to be exact.

One must question what is Mitt Romney to do? No one knows, but mighty Mitt. I’m sure by the time you read this we will know more so for the sake of that I will talk about the future. There are still several more primaries to go and as you know nothing is over as no candidate is anywhere near the votes needed to claim 100% victory. I do not foresee Mitt Romney dropping out as of yet. If he is able to pick up more delegates than a surprising Mike Huckabee at the end of the tally then he is definitely the second place finisher. Is this enough to make John McCain choose him as his running mate? Is this enough to make conservatives vote for John McCain? After seeing many conservatives dismissing John McCain completely, and seeing the amount of votes on the democratic side, one must admit that a McCain/Romney ticket would be much better than a McCain/Huckabee ticket in November. After all if it’s a Clinton/Obama ticket, then we really have something to talk about. Be that as it may, ultimately, John McCain must seriously consider this as many will not vote for him in November. This is wrong. As a party we must welcome whoever the candidate is and vote for him. We must have faith that this individual will carry out the conservative principles we hold dear and follow our instructions as his voters. McCain will not be able to open the borders. He will have to back tax cuts and make them permanent. And he will definitely need to convince millions that he is the man for the job.

If Romney were to be invited to be McCain’s running mate, Romney will definitely have to think of McCain’s age. Is it possible for a man to be president until he is 80 years old? Is it possible that McCain could run for 1 term, God forbid have health issues and not seek a second term? Is it possible for a president to seek council from a VP for once? Certainly. But we must see that because of these strange circumstances anything is possible.  Good and bad.

I will ask the remaining voters to vote in their elections, not just for a front runner, but assuming Romney remains in the election through March 4th, which it looks like he will, to consider him as your candidate. Conventions are funny things. And if no candidate has the amount of delegates needed to claim victory, so we still have a choice in our candidate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Alliances in the GOP?

Is it possible that voters who vote for Huckabee are actually voting for John McCain?
I didnt realize that John McCain was looking for a running mate.  In fact, the funny thing is that most people would have liked to see Romney and Huck together ultimately.  But apparently since McCain doesnt think he will ever get an evangelical vote, he is trying to form an alliance.  We saw what happened in West Virginia.  Even with endorsements from so many Talk Show hosts such as Laura Ingraham, Romney needs votes to win delegates.
I will be voting for Mitt Romney today here in California and I hope those of you out west who haven't yet will do the same.  We  know that he is the best conservative candidate.  But does the rest of the country? We shall see.

A vote for Mitt is a vote for success in this nation.




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democracy and Super Delegates

Super Tuesday means much more to the Republican party. Why, you may ask? Because of Super Delegates of course! The DNC chooses their nominee not the democratic voter. I couldn’t believe that this slipped my mind, and perhaps it slipped yours also. Reading an article yesterday regarding this exact situation blew me away. Basically, there are 842 un-pledged super delegates which are almost 40% of the total delegates needed to get the nomination. None of these delegates are chosen by the voter. Who are they chosen by? Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore and many who were appointed by Howard Dean. Wow! It really makes you want to join the Democratic party. After all, DEMOCRACY does not exist in that party. They have Obama who is an invented candidate. Yes, he was and still is. He was created and thrown into this election by the media and other media personalities, I.E. Oprah. No one heard of this guy prior to the media giving all their attention to him. You could argue that the Clinton machine was responsible for this because they chose a guy most people figured would be unlikely to get the nomination. For several reasons, 1) his background and where he lived previously, 2) questions about his religion, 3) the fact no one knows who he is, 4) yes, even the color of skin was part of the scenario. The latter generates a media circus because he is now not only the first African-American to win a primary/caucus, but he really is the first to actually have a chance. Former African-American candidates were simply hopeless, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to name a couple. The problem with this theory is that Obama forgets that it’s the Clinton left wing machine that is controlling things. She will get the nomination because of the super-delegates.

Did the Clintons misjudge Obama? You bet. He is taking this seriously, and he should. He does have a shot in his mind. The Clintons figured he was a throw away and would never win anything, and he would even make Hillary look more moderate. They were not counting on his recent surge which is pulling him closer day by day. They did not count on Obama making Hillary look even more liberal. We will know more after Super-Tuesday.

But I hate to be a fly in Obama’s ointment. He will never win the nomination because he lacks the ‘Super-Delegates’. Unless the DNC is persuaded otherwise their candidate is Hillary, she was their candidate right after the 2000 election, kind of like liberal John McCain for the GOP. I wonder if we live in a democracy after all.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »